Redefining the Role of Judges in Achieving Substantive Justice in Corruption Cases

Authors
  • Nur Azizah

    Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Author

  • Dewi Lestari

    Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Author

  • Putri Amalia

    Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, Indonesia

    Author

  • Nabila Zahra

    Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Nilai, Malaysia

    Author

  • Salma Khairunnisa

    Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands

    Author

Keywords:
Reconstruction, Role of Judges, Substantive Justice, Corruption Cases, Paradigm Shift
Abstract

Substantive justice in corruption cases can only be achieved if judges dare to redefine themselves as reflective and transformative actors. This study aims to analyse and formulate a reimagining of the judge’s role in achieving substantive justice in corruption cases in Indonesia. This study employs a juridical-normative approach, enriched by a socio-legal perspective, within an exploratory-analytical qualitative research design. The findings unequivocally challenge the judicial orthodoxy that positions judges merely as enforcers of norms, by asserting that in corruption cases, a rigidly neutral stance risks reproducing structural injustice. Thus, the reconstruction of the judge’s role as an architect of substantive justice is no longer an option, but a normative and ethical imperative. This study offers a novel approach through a critical synthesis of judicial independence, legal politics, and a sentencing paradigm that positions judges as reflective actors who dare to interpret the law progressively while remaining accountable, thereby simultaneously integrating deterrence, the recovery of state losses, and social justice. The implications call for fundamental reform of the penal system, the strengthening of protections for judicial independence against the pressures of populism and power, and a transformation of legal education that is no longer merely legalistic.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References

Dona, F., Ariyani, E., Junaidi, J., Zahriani, L., & Fattaah, A. (2025). Implementing Restorative Justice in Criminal Case Resolution: A Socio-Legal Research. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 10(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v10i1.10263

Koeswayo, P. S., Handoyo, S., & Abdul Hasyir, D. (2024). Investigating the relationship between public governance and the corruption perception index. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2342513. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2342513

Kristiana, Y., & Hutahayan, B. (2024). Judicial corruption in the post-reform era: Assessing the effectiveness of legal reforms in Indonesia. International Criminal Law Review, 25(2–3), 420–441. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10208

Kubal, A. (2024). Judicial relational legal consciousness: authoritarian backsliding as a catalyst of change. Journal of Law and Society, 51(Galleli, B., Amaral, L. (2026). Bridging institutional theory and social and environmental efforts in management: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 52(1), 42–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251322429), S45–S65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12497

Mears, D. P., & Stafford, M. C. (2024). A theoretical critique of deterrence-based policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 95, 102305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102305

Nii Laryeafio, M., & Ogbewe, O. C. (2023). Ethical consideration dilemma: systematic review of ethics in qualitative data collection through interviews. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology, 3(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEET-09-2022-0014

Peterson, D., Bedner, A., & Berenschot, W. (2025). The perils of legal formalism: Litigating land conflicts in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 55(3), 430–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2024.2440855

Purwanti, A., & Natalis, A. (2025). Law as Text, Culture as Context: The Semiotics of Marriage Dispensation and Judicial Considerations in Indonesia. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10370-0

Swenson, G. (2025). Symbolic Rule of Law Promotion. Law & Social Inquiry, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2025.10127

Wakwabubi, M. J., & Orobia, L. A. (2025). Unpacking the experiences of corruption in local governments: a phenomenological study. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2025-5725

Cover Image
Published
2026-03-01
Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Azizah, Dewi Lestari, Putri Amalia, Nabila Zahra, Salma Khairunnisa (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Redefining the Role of Judges in Achieving Substantive Justice in Corruption Cases. (2026). Indonesian Journal of Corruption and Criminal Justice, 1(1), 1-12. https://ejournal.mahkotascience.org/index.php/ijccj/article/view/6