Reorientation of the Principle of Legality in the Handling of Corruption Offences in Indonesia

Authors

  • Fitri Ramadhani

    Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Author

  • Fitria Handayani

    Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Author

  • Humaira Syakira

    Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Sukoharjo, Indonesia

    Author

  • Olivia Smith

    Florida State University, Florida, United States

    Author

  • Yuki Tanaka

    Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Author

Keywords:
Reorientation, Principle of Legality, Corruption Offences, Extraordinary Crimes, Normative Formalism
Abstract

The reorientation of the principle of legality in the handling of corruption offences in Indonesia is essential to challenge normative formalism. This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of how the principle of legality can be reoriented within the framework of handling corruption offences in Indonesia. This study employs a legal-normative approach enriched with a socio-legal design and critical qualitative analysis to examine the reorientation of the principle of legality in the handling of corruption offences. The results confirm that upholding the principle of legality in its formalistic guise risks turning the law into a covert protector of modern corruption; consequently, a reorientation towards substantive and progressive legality is no longer an option but an epistemological and practical necessity within Indonesia’s criminal law system. The expansion of the meaning of unlawful acts and the interpretative boldness of judges can serve as emancipatory tools to break through normative deadlocks, yet without strict methodological boundaries, this risks giving rise to over-criminalisation and the erosion of legal legitimacy; thus, a new construct is required in the form of calibrated legality, flexible in addressing the complexities of corruption, yet still governed by the principles of proportionality, rationality, and accountability. The novelty of this study lies in a paradigm shift from legality as a bastion of certainty to legality as a measurable instrument of justice, which theoretically challenges the dominance of legal positivism and, practically, encourages the formation of more progressive yet standardised interpretative guidelines.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References

Ali, M., Muliyono, A., & Nurhidayat, S. (2023). The application of a human rights approach toward crimes of corruption: analyzing anti-corruption regulations and judicial decisions. Laws, 12(4), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040068

Blackham, A. (2022). When law and data collide: the methodological challenge of conducting mixed methods research in law. Journal of Law and Society, 49, S87–S104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12373

Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s new Criminal Code: indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772

Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: rethinking penal reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2301634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634

Hannant, T. (2025). Deadlock in Rule of Law Theory and the Potential of Internal Critique. Legal Theory, 31(3), 215–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325225100748

Hao, C. (2025). Understanding Contemporary Chinese Legal Dogmatics of Criminal Law. In Handbook of Contemporary Chinese Social Sciences (pp. 449–500). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4026-0_13

Hoyle, C., & Harry, L. (2025). Diversion or death? The moral framework shaping bifurcated punishments for drug offences in Indonesia. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 32(4), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2024.2402262

Kristiana, Y., & Hutahayan, B. (2024). Judicial corruption in the post-reform era: Assessing the effectiveness of legal reforms in Indonesia. International Criminal Law Review, 25(2–3), 420–441. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10208

Lorenz, A., Anders, L. H., Müller, D., & Němec, J. (2024). What the Rule of Law Is About. Narrating Its Foundations. In Narrating the Rule of Law: Patterns in East Central European Parliaments (pp. 121–245). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66332-1_5

Nasutioon, S. I. (2025). Mono-Dualistic Theory and the Principle of Balance: A Conceptual Framework for Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia. Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v10i2.6649

Puspito, B., & Masyhar, A. (2023). Dynamics of Legality Principles in Indonesian National Criminal Law Reform. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i1.64078

Tambunan, D. (2023). Indonesia under threat: The danger of corruption to political legitimacy. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(1), 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911221124965

Thamsir, M., Latif, M., & Muhammad, P. (2025). Islamic Criminal Law Reform in Corruption Cases: Maqasid al-Shariah Perspective. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 10(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i1.10932

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-03-03
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): March
Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2026 Fitri Ramadhani, Fitria Handayani, Humaira Syakira, Olivia Smith, Yuki Tanaka (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Reorientation of the Principle of Legality in the Handling of Corruption Offences in Indonesia. (2026). Indonesian Journal of Corruption and Criminal Justice, 1(1), 36-46. https://ejournal.mahkotascience.org/index.php/ijccj/article/view/9